MIT 18.701 — Lecture 13

Conjugacy Classes, Centralizer, Center, Class Equation, Extensions, Simple Groups

There are two ways that a group GG can act on itself:

We've explored the former already in the proof of Cayley's Theorem. But conjugation is also worth exploring!

§ Group Actions by Conjugation

Definition (Conjugacy Classes and Centralizers). Let GG act on itself via conjugation. Then:

Some useful facts about conjugacy classes and centralizers:

Example. The conjugacy classes of S3S_3 are {1}\{1\}, {(1 2),(1 3),(2 3)}\{(1 \ 2), (1 \ 3), (2 \ 3)\}, and {(1 2 3),(1 3 2)}\{(1 \ 2 \ 3), (1 \ 3 \ 2)\}.

Example. The conjugacy classes of D5D_5 are {1}\{1\}, {r,r1}\{r, r^{-1}\}, {r2,r2}\{r^2, r^{-2}\}, and {all five reflections}\{\text{all five reflections}\}.

Example. The conjugacy classes of D4D_4 are {1}\{1\}, {r,r1}\{r, r^{-1}\}, {r2}\{r^2\}, {diagonal reflections}\{\text{diagonal reflections}\}, and {midline reflections}\{\text{midline reflections}\}.

Remark. The conjugacy classes capture the geometric distinctions between D4D_4 and D5D_5. In particular, all reflections in D5D_5 look the same, whereas reflections in D4D_4 come in two different forms.

§ The Class Equation: Classifying Groups of p2p^2 Order

Definition (Class Equation). If finite GG has conjugacy classes C1,,CkC_1, \dots, C_k, the class equation says G=i=1kCi|G| = \sum_{i = 1}^k |C_i|.

Example. The class equations of D4D_4 and D5D_5 read 8=1+2+1+2+28 = 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 2 and 10=1+2+2+510 = 1 + 2 + 2 + 5, respectively.

Definition (pp-group). For primes pp, a group GG is a pp-group if G=pk|G| = p^k for some k{0,1,2,}k \in \{0, 1, 2, \dots\}.

Example. All of the following are pp-groups:

{1}   or   Cp   or   Cp×Cp   or   Cp2   or   {[1xy01z001]:x,y,zFp}\{1\} ~~ \text{ or } ~~ C_p ~~ \text{ or } ~~ C_p \times C_p ~~ \text{ or }~~ C_{p^2} ~~ \text{ or } ~~ \left \{ \left[\begin{smallmatrix} 1 & x & y \\ 0 & 1 & z \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix}\right]: x, y, z \in \mathbb{F}_p\right \}

The big goal of today's lecture will be to use the Class Equation to prove the following:

Theorem. If group GG has order p2p^2 for some prime pp, then either GCp×CpG \cong C_p \times C_p or GCp2G \cong C_{p^2}.

The proof of this theorem will come in three steps.

Theorem. (Claim #1: Nontrivial Center) Every nontrivial group of order pkp^k has a nontrivial center.

Proof: Suppose the center has size nn. Then the Class Equation reads:

1++1n times + Cn+1++C=pk.\underbrace{1 + \dots + 1}_{n \text{ times}} ~ + ~ |C_{n + 1}| + \dots + |C_\ell| = p^k.

The key observation is that, for all Ci{Cn+1,,C}C_i \in \{C_{n + 1}, \dots, C_{\ell}\}, we have pCip \mid |C_i| by Orbit-Stabilizer. So the above equation modulo pp reads n0(modp)n \equiv 0 \pmod{p}. But n0n \neq 0 since idZ(G)\mathrm{id} \in Z(G), so npn \geq p, done.   \blacksquare

Note that the above claim holds for any nontrivial group GG of prime-power order! But when G=p2|G| = p^2, specifically…

Theorem. (Claim #2: Abelian) Since G=p2|G| = p^2, it must be that GG is abelian.

Proof: Equivalently, we wish to show Z(G)=p2|Z(G)| = p^2. Since Z(G)Z(G) is a subgroup of GG, by Lagrange's Theorem, Z(G)|Z(G)| divides p2p^2. Claim #1 then says either Z(G)=p|Z(G)| = p or Z(G)=p2|Z(G)| = p^2. Argue by contradiction: suppose Z(G)=p|Z(G)| = p.

Recall that Z(G)Z(G) is normal. Thus, if Z(G)=p|Z(G)| = p, then G/Z(G)=p|G / Z(G)| = p, meaning G/Z(G)CpG / Z(G) \cong C_p. In particular, if we pick any x∉Z(G)x \not \in Z(G), then GG must be generated by xx and Z(G)Z(G). Therefore,

G={xkzk{0,1,,p1} and zZ(G)}.G = \{x^k z \mid k \in \{0, 1, \dots, p - 1\} \text{ and } z \in Z(G)\}.

Since Z(G)Z(G) commutes with xx, the above means GG is abelian, and in particular Z(G)=p2|Z(G)| = p^2 (contradiction).   \blacksquare

We're now ready to finish the proof.

Theorem. (Claim #3: Classification) If G=p2|G| = p^2 and GG is abelian, then GCp×CpG \cong C_p \times C_p or GCp2G \cong C_{p^2}.

Proof: If GG has an element of order p2p^2, then GCp2G \cong C_{p^2}. The only other case is that every xGx \in G has order dividing pp.

In this latter case, we claim GG may be viewed as an Fp\mathbb{F}_p vector space. To confirm this is legal, we must check:

Recall that all Fp\mathbb{F}_p vector spaces are isomorphic to Fpk\mathbb{F}_p^k (i.e. pick a basis). Thus, GFp2G \cong \mathbb{F}_p^2, so GCp×CpG \cong C_p \times C_p.   \blacksquare

§ Definitions: Group Extensions

Definition (Extensions). For group GG and normal subgroup NGN \unlhd G, say GG is an extension of G/NG/N by NN.

Suppose GG is an extension of AA by BB. Some warnings:

Definition (Split Extension). Say GG is a split extension of G/NG/N by NN, with π:GG/N\pi: G \to G/N, if there exists a subgroup HGH \subseteq G such that πH:HG/N\pi |_H: H \to G/N is an isomorphism.

In other words, GG is a split extension of AA by BB if the quotient G/BAG / B \cong A is visibly embedded within GG.

Example. For any groups GG and HH, G×HG \times H is a split extension of GG by HH.

Example. For any nn, the isometry group MnM_n is a split extension of On(R)O_n(\mathbb{R}) by Rn\mathbb{R}^n. In other words, the quotient On(R)Mn/RnO_n(\mathbb{R}) \cong M_n / \mathbb{R}^n is visibly embedded within MnM_n.

§ Definitions: We're a Finite Simple Group…

Definition (Simple Groups). A nontrivial group GG is simple if it has no normal subgroups besides {1}\{1\} and GG.

Example. For any prime pp, the group CpC_p is simple. For any n5n \geq 5, the group AnA_n is simple—this is nonobvious!

The classification of all finite simple groups looks like:

For further details, see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_of_finite_simple_groups.