Let's do it all again for DT. You might take the following as a prototypical example.
f[n]:={10 if n∈{−2,−1,0,1,2}. otherwise.
The goal, as before, is to express f[n] as a sum (or rather, integral) of complex exponentials, even though f[n] is aperiodic.
We'll just cut straight to the punchline this time.
Theorem. (DT Fourier Transform) Given a DT signal f[n], define its Fourier transform to be F(Ω):=∑n=−∞∞f[n]e−jΩn. It then follows that f[n]=2π1∫02πF(Ω)ejΩndΩ.
Remark. Even though the signal f[n] is discrete and possibly aperiodic, the Fourier transform F(Ω) is continuous and guaranteed periodic with period 2π.
Proof: Our strategy is the same as last time: consider signals fN[n] that are extensions of f[n] to have period N, take the DT Fourier series of fN[n], and investigate the series for N→∞.
The DT Fourier series for fN[n] looks like:
fN[n]=k∈⟨N⟩∑FN[k]ejn(2πk/N) where FN[k]=N1n∈⟨N⟩∑fN[n]e−jn(2πk/N).
Here, ⟨N⟩ denotes a set of N consecutive integers roughly centered at zero. Remember that for DT Fourier series, FN[k] is a finite array of length N, or equivalently, an infinite array with period N.
Let's follow the recipe from last time: take F(Ω):=limN→∞N⋅FN[k], where the continuous frequency variable Ω:=2πk/N is held fixed as N→∞ (so the index k grows in proportion to N). Then:
Just as promised. Now make the parametrization {Ωk}k∈⟨N⟩ where Ωk:=2πk/N. Noting that ΔΩ:=Ωk+1−Ωk=2π/N and sending N→∞, the Fourier series becomes:
Just as promised. Here, ⟨2π⟩ refers to any interval of length 2π; it appears because the set of frequencies {Ωk}k∈⟨N⟩ covers an interval of length 2π in the limit N→∞. ■
Remark. Given a DT signal f[n], consider the “staircase” CT signal g(t):=f[⌊t⌋]. Then the following claim (perhaps surprisingly!) is false.
False Claim. The CT Fourier transform G(ω) of g(t) is the same as the DT Fourier transform F(Ω) of f[n].
To see why this claim fails, compute G(ω) one staircase step at a time:
So the CTFT G(ω) is the DTFT F(Ω)times an extra decay factor of [jω1−e−jω].
This factor is also why the synthesis equations differ: the CTFT G(ω) decays, so it's aperiodic and thus synthesized by ∫−∞∞. In contrast, F(Ω) is 2π-periodic and thus synthesized by ∫02π.
Problem. Compute the DT Fourier transform of the following DT signal, where S is a positive integer.
Here, we simplify a finite geometric series, then multiply the numerator and denominator by ejΩ/2 to reach a quotient of sines. ■
§ Lecture and Recitation: Properties of the DT Fourier Transform
Here's what the Fourier transforms of the f[n] signal from the previous example look like for different values of S.
Because we're working with DT signals, it's hard to formally put into words the time-scaling property.
Other than time-scaling and duality, all of the other CT Fourier transform properties can be ported over to DT easily. (Proofs are obvious.)
Theorem. (Even / Odd) If f[n] is real and even, F(Ω) is real and even. If f[n] is real and odd, F(Ω) is imaginary and odd.
Theorem. (Hermitian Symmetry) If f[n] is real, then F(−Ω)=F(Ω) for all Ω.
Theorem. (DT Areas) The value of f[0] is 2π1∫02πF(Ω)dΩ, and the value of F(0) is ∑n=−∞∞f[n].
Theorem. (Time Delay) The FT of f[n−n0] is e−jΩn0F(Ω).
Theorem. (Derivative FT) If the FT of f[n] is F(Ω), then the FT of g[n]:=nf[n] is G(Ω)=jF′(Ω).
Theorem. (Kronecker Delta FT) Let the Kronecker delta functionδ[n] be defined so that δ[0]=1 and δ[k]=0 for all k=0. The FT of δ[n] is the constant function F(Ω)=1.
Theorem. (Periodic DT) Suppose f[n] is a periodic signal with Fourier coefficients F[k], so that f[n]=∑k=0N−1F[k]ejn(2πk/N). Then, treating F[k] as an infinite array with period N, the Fourier transform of f[n] is F(Ω)=∑k=−∞∞2πF[k]δ(Ω−N2πk).
Here's what that last theorem looks like visually.